
Search
this site by entering keywords in the box below followed by the
keyboard ENTER key.
|


|
KEEPING
THE RESCUERS IN HISTORICAL
PERSPECTIVE
by Alex Grobman,
Ph.D.
"Stories about Christian rescuers
of Jews during the Holocaust threaten to erase from our collective memory
the epidemic outbreak of gross cruelty that accompanied the advance of
the Nazi terror machine . . ." declared Fanya Gottesfeld Heller, a
survivor of the Holocaust, in a letter to The New York Times. Although
she had been saved by righteous Christians, she is distressed that "not
only the guilty . . . prefer anointing the heroes to condemning the villains,"
but "an entire generation of Jewish youth, secure in their own society,
wants desperately to be assured that the killers, rather than the rescuers,
were the aberration."1
Ms.
Heller is not alone in her concerns about the danger of inflating the historical
importance of the rescuers. Other survivors and historians share her apprehensions
and with some justification. At a conference titled "The Holocaust
in Southern Europe," sponsored by the National Italian Foundation
and held at the New York University Law School, the organizers did not
focus on the role that Italian fascism might have played in creating fertile
ground for the rise of Nazi ideology in Germany or the attempts to annihilate
the Jews in Southern Europe. Instead, the organizers stressed the decent
behavior of Italian citizens, diplomats, and soldiers who sheltered and
protected Jews in Italy and elsewhere until 1943, when the Nazis occupied
northern and central Italy.
The
New York Times reported that a woman at the conference asked why had
it taken 50 years before the "true story" about Italy's behavior
during the war had come to light. Somehow, these vignettes about Italians,
who acted according to their conscience and religious beliefs, negated
the role Italy played during the rest of the war. Another member of the
audience, apparently oblivious to the silence of the Vatican on the destruction
of the Jews of Europe, stated that whenever the Vatican attempted to help
the Jews, conditions became worse for the Church. And yet, this individual
wanted to know when the "true story" about the heroic efforts
of the Christian convents, clergy, and schools to protect Jews would be
told.
Two
additional examples will provide further illustration of the moral confusion
and distortion of history that this issue has caused. Susan Zuccotti, a
professor of history at Barnard College and author of The Holocaust,
the French and the Jews, concludes that given the virulent antisemitism
raging in France during the war, the French should be commended for the
"generosity, tolerance, and fundamental humanity" that enabled
76 percent, or 250,000 French Jews, to survive.
At
the trial in France of Paul Touvier, an official in the Vichy secret police
charged with crimes against humanity, the defense attempted to resort to
the "Schindler defense." Touvier asserted that the Gestapo had
demanded that he execute 100 Jews, but he agreed to killing just 30. Since
he had only seven Jews executed near Lyon, Touvier claimed that he had
actually saved 23 Jews. The court rejected his claim and convicted him.
Under
the circumstances, we can understand why Raul Hilberg, a Holocaust historian,
sees the emphasis on rescue as misleading. For him, "there is nothing
to be taken from the Holocaust that imbues anyone with hope or any thought
of redemption, but the need for heroes is so strong that we'll manufacture
them." 2
The
danger of distorting the history of the Holocaust -- of not focusing on
the major themes of abandonment, passivity, and complicity is very real
but some distortion is inevitable no matter what we do. As long as we understand
that the efforts of the rescuers are a small part of the picture, we have
an obligation to tell what these people did. For Jews, our tradition requires
hakarat hatov, the recognition of good deeds.
There
is another issue as well. "Racial and religious hatred is a luxury
in which no nation or group can indulge without the danger of setting its
own house on fire. It is like playing with dynamite or even worse! -- with
hydrogen bombs," warned Father John O'Brien of the University of Notre
Dame. "The insensate fury which such hatred releases comes back to
purge and bestialize the hater it degrades, demoralizes, and dehumanizes
him as no external enemy can possibly do."
The
rescuers show us that one individual can make a difference, and "that
we are all traveling in the same boat. The occupant who drives a hole under
the part where his neighbor is seated, finds that the water engulfs him
as well and carries him to destruction." 3 Our challenge
is to keep these stories in perspective without losing sight of the entire
history of the Holocaust. We owe that to the rescuers and to those who
perished.
ENDNOTES
1 "Holocaust Rescuers Were Rare Exceptions," The
New York Times, July 9, 1994. p. 18.
2 "Good Germans, Honoring the Heroes And Hiding the Holocaust,"
The New York Times, June 12, 1994, pp. 1 and 6.
3 Philip Friedman. Their Brothers' Keepers. New York
Crown Publishers, 1957 ,pp. 10-11.
|